🔗 Share this article

This move from the DNC to withhold the release of its own autopsy report on the last presidential race is stunning however to be expected. Resistant to frank assessments, the DNC operates closer to a PR firm than an electoral entity committed to cultivating grassroots capacities capable of prevailing at the polls.

An Environment Resistant to Internal Critique

Hesitant to break with the party establishment's culture of conformity, the DNC has stayed within the Biden-Harris shadow all through this past year. Making public an official autopsy would have indicated whether party leaders are interested to promote public discourse about the strategic failures that paved the way for the former president to win re-election. Instead, the leadership is moving forward as if there's nothing to glean following the stunning loss from the last cycle.

Our guiding principle: is this good for winning elections? If not, it becomes a sideline issue from the core mission," a justification which was presented to justify concealing the document.

Critical Problems an Autopsy Might Have Addressed

A genuine analysis worth its salt would not dodge key points of failure. This encompasses:

• Voter Alienation: The loss among a significant portion of the electorate that backed the Democratic ticket during the previous election proved pivotal during the tight recent race.
• A Decision to Seek Re-election: The unwavering choice by a party leader to seek re-election, alongside a last-minute exit, has been criticized as denying the party's base the chance for a competitive nomination process.
• Abandoning Core Democratic Voters: Amid economic anxiety, the campaign allegedly accommodating corporate donors' interests without successfully attempting to challenge the effects of profit-seeking.
• A Foreign Policy Impact: The failure to reconsider a stance concerning a ongoing war is cited as driving away key demographic groups, particularly with youth voters, Arab-Americans, Muslim voters.
• Losing Youth Allegiance: Polling data indicates a major decline of votes for the candidate from voters aged 18-29.

A Pattern of Evasion

Choosing secrecy fits a longstanding habit of evading uncomfortable facts. This mirrors an episode in which virtually every Democratic officeholder in Congress acquiesced to a sitting president's decision for running for re-election until a disastrous campaign event forced a change.

At the same time, a significant majority of Democratic voters were consistently telling surveyors of their opposition to the incumbent to run again.

Financial Concerns

An honest analysis could probe issues regarding campaign spending, such as the amounts were directed to party strategists and advertising contractors during a campaign which expended a colossal war chest during the general election.

A Larger Problem

Fundamentally, the blockage of the official autopsy points to an allegiance toward party leaders responsible for a disastrous presidential campaign. The message to the party's base – including countless loyal volunteers – is that they do not be trusted to understand what the insiders claim to have learned from an analysis compiled from feedback from all states.

An organization unable to honestly assess its mistakes finds it difficult to break free from the pattern that proved so helpful to their opponents.