🔗 Share this article

Established parties in power are more and more enabling the far right to dictate the political agenda, according to a recent study conducted in Germany.

Academics discovered that this phenomenon has inadvertently helped radical groups by legitimising their ideas and disseminating them more widely.

Study Based on Two Decades of Media Coverage

The results, published in the European Journal of Political Research, utilized an automated text analysis of over 520,000 news pieces from six national newspapers.

Berlin-based researchers observed that as the radical faction shifted from marginal topics in the 1990s era to central subjects like integration and migration, established political groups progressively adapted their messaging in response.

This adaptation amplified the dissemination of these concepts and indicated to voters that such stances were legitimate.

Implications for Democratic Systems

"Public communication by mainstream political groups is crucial in the voting performance of the far right," stated a expert in political behavior involved in the research.

"This element has been overlooked," she noted.

The impact was evident even when conventional groups were condemning the radical faction. "They still receive focus," the expert remarked. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this attention is crucial."

Normalisation Phenomenon Throughout Europe

While the study was centered around the German context, this mainstreaming phenomenon is probable to affect nations across the European continent.

"You see this a lot in German and British media," said another researcher. "Radical groups makes a statement and everybody begins discussing it for several days."

"Even if you're opposing it, you're echoing it," he added.

Hardening of Political Rhetoric

At certain points, political figures have also toughened their language to align with that of the far right.

In a recently published discussion, a then German chancellor advocated large-scale deportations and urged them to happen "more often and faster."

Similar examples can be found across Europe, as politicians from countries including the United Kingdom to the French Republic adopt the rhetoric of the far right, particularly on immigration.

This has created an echo chamber that was inconceivable a ten years prior.

Central Problem: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist party and you are talking about cultural issues – migration, assimilation – in a way that is dictated by the rhythm of the far right, that's the whole idea of narrative control," clarified a study author.

Other parties have taken additional measures, seeking to copy the hardline platform of the radical right, despite studies indicates that doing so leads voters to cast their ballot for the far right.

Gradual Impact and Voter Awareness

The scope of data collected showed that the influence of radical groups had been gradual and had grown with the passage of time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from day to day," commented a researcher. "However, when you encounter this pessimistic narrative around migration frequently, and it is being disseminated not only by radical groups but also, for instance, by mainstream parties, then of course this storyline travels further."

Need for Mainstream Groups to Carve Out Their Distinct Discourses

The research emphasized the necessity for established political parties to develop their own discourses, particularly on subjects such as migration and assimilation, instead of constantly following the radical right.

"It's like a dance," explained one researcher. "When the leader is far-right and you're responding to them, you cannot decide which music should be playing."