🔗 Share this article

Apple may have to permit competitors to operate their own application platforms on iPhones across Britain, following a decision from the market watchdog.

This represents a significant change to Apple's infamous "walled garden" where apps can only be downloaded from its own App Store.

But the UK competition watchdog has classified both Apple and Google as having "dominant market position" - effectively saying they have significant control over mobile platforms.

Regulatory Assessment

The CMA said the two companies "could be restricting innovation and market rivalry".

But the regulator clarified it did not "find or assume wrongdoing" from the companies.

"Mobile applications contributes 1.5% of the British economy and supports around four hundred thousand positions, which is why it's crucial these markets function properly for enterprises," commented a top executive from the competition authority.

Approximately ninety to one hundred percent of British smartphones operate using Apple or Google's mobile platforms, creating what the authority calls an "virtual monopoly".

According to recent analysis, nearly half of British smartphone users use an Apple device - which runs the iOS operating system - with the vast majority of the rest using Google's Android.

The Company's Reaction

The regulatory probe focused on how prominent the companies' own apps are versus rivals - as well as their browsers and platform software.

It is unknown what changes the regulator will seek to implement, but earlier it published roadmaps outlining potential measures it could take.

These include requiring it to be easier for people to switch between iOS and Android phones, and for both companies to list applications "fairly and openly" in their marketplaces.

Apple specifically may be required to allow third-party marketplaces on its devices, and let people to install apps directly from developer sites.

This would mirror comparable regulations in the EU, which previously imposed measures against the company for anti-competitive behaviour.

Apple cautioned the United Kingdom could face delays to getting new features - as has happened in the European Union - which the organization attributes to heavy regulation.

For instance, some Apple Intelligence features which have been rolled out in other regions are not accessible in the EU.

"Apple encounters intense rivalry in every market where we do business, and we work tirelessly to create the best products, solutions and customer interface," the organization said in a statement.

"The UK's adoption of European regulations would undermine that, resulting in consumers with reduced data protection and safety, slower availability to latest functions, and a divided, more complicated user journey."

Google's Standpoint

Android users can presently use third-party app stores - though commentators say they are not as smooth as the company's official Play Store.

The CMA's roadmap said Google may have to "change the user experience" of downloading apps directly from websites, as well as "remove user frictions" when using third-party platforms.

"There appears to be no the rationale for today's designation decision," a Google policy executive stated.

The representative said "most" of Android users use alternative app stores or download apps directly from a developer's website, and claimed there is a much wider selection of applications offered for Google device owners versus those on Apple devices.

"Currently available are 24,000 Android phone models from 1,300 phone manufacturers globally, facing intense competition from iOS in the UK," the representative continued.

Google's platform is an freely available software, which means creators can use and build on top of it for free.

The company contends this means it opens up competition.

But consumer groups said curbs on these firms' dominance in different nations "are already helping enterprises to innovate and giving customers more options".

"The companies' control is now creating genuine problems by limiting options for users and competition for businesses," stated a consumer advocate.