🔗 Share this article

Official briefings show that policymakers implemented a outlawing on Palestine Action even after being given warnings that such measures could “unintentionally boost” the organization’s visibility, per leaked internal briefings.

Background

This advisory report was written 90 days ahead of the formal banning of the network, which was formed to take direct action designed to halt UK weapons exports to Israel.

It was written three months ago by personnel at the Home Office and the local governance ministry, assisted by anti-terror specialists.

Opinion Polling

Beneath the subheading “What would be the outlawing of the group be viewed by citizens”, one section of the briefing cautioned that a ban could prove to be a controversial matter.

It described Palestine Action as a “modest single issue organization with reduced mainstream media coverage” in contrast with other direct action organizations like environmental activists. Yet it highlighted that the organisation’s protests, and arrests of its supporters, had attracted publicity.

Experts stated that research indicated “increasing discontent with Israel’s defense tactics in Gaza”.

Leading up to its main point, the briefing referenced a poll indicating that three-fifths of the UK public thought Israel had exceeded limits in the conflict in Gaza and that a similar number supported a prohibition on weapons exports.

“These constitute positions around which PAG forms its identity, organising explicitly to oppose the nation’s arms industry in the UK,” it said.

“Should that Palestine Action is outlawed, their public image may inadvertently be enhanced, attracting sympathy among sympathetic citizens who oppose the British role in the Israeli arms industry.”

Additional Warnings

Experts noted that the general populace were against appeals from the certain outlets for harsh steps, including a proscription.

Additional parts of the report cited polling showing the public had a “general lack of awareness” concerning the network.

Officials wrote that “much of the UK population are probably at this time ignorant of Palestine Action and would remain so if there is a ban or, upon being told, would stay mostly unconcerned”.

This proscription under terrorism laws has sparked protests where many individuals have been apprehended for carrying placards in the streets stating “I oppose genocide, I back Palestine Action”.

This briefing, which was a public reaction study, said that a ban under security legislation could increase Muslim-Jewish tensions and be perceived as government bias in toward Israel.

Officials alerted ministers and high-level staff that a ban could become “a catalyst for major controversy and objections”.

Post-Ban Developments

Huda Ammori of the group, commented that the briefing’s warnings had materialized: “Awareness of the matters and popularity of the network have increased dramatically. The outlawing has backfired.”

The interior minister at the time, Yvette Cooper, revealed the ban in June, right after the group’s activists allegedly caused damage at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire. Officials stated the harm was extensive.

The schedule of the document demonstrates the ban was being planned long prior to it was announced.

Ministers were told that a proscription might be seen as an assault on individual rights, with the officials stating that certain people in the administration as well as the wider public may view the measure as “a creep of terrorism powers into the realm of free expression and demonstration.”

Official Responses

A Home Office official commented: “Palestine Action has carried out an increasingly aggressive series involving vandalism to the UK’s key installations, intimidation, and claimed attacks. That activity puts the safety and security of the citizens at peril.

“Decisions on outlawing are thoroughly evaluated. They are based on a robust data-supported procedure, with assistance from a wide range of specialists from various departments, the authorities and the MI5.”

A counter-terrorism policing spokesperson stated: “Judgments relating to outlawing are a responsibility for the administration.

“In line with public expectations, counter-terrorism policing, alongside a range of further organizations, regularly supply information to the Home Office to aid their operations.”

The document also showed that the central government had been funding monthly surveys of community tensions related to the Middle East conflict.